But the side effect is like what you said, many songs are harder to crack the top10 due to lack of exposure. Now the reformed chart basically eliminate the ability of songs to shoot straight to #1 due to fandom. It basically makes the chart more volatile and some of these #1 are not as valuable/meaningful as they were strongly fandom driven. Songs, especially big hits, supposed to stay on top for some time.īefore reform, there were so many songs hitting the top10 or even #1 but many of those fall off after a while. But how can I forget all the days and nights weve had neom nappasseo neon nega eopseumyeon himdeun nal almyeonseodo. urin kkeunnan geojana nado algo itdan mallya. These changes are actually what Melon intended. Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh (sulbeoreut) Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh (sulbeoreut) Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh (sulbeoreut) sulbeoreut. I dont think people are denying difference between pre and post reform. What I have seen so far with my analysis is that yes, there are indeed differences in post-Reform chart behaviour that are worthy of our consideration. the performance of ' Dynamite'), but as far as I know, nobody has backed up these assertions with a comprehensive review of actual Melon data. There is some anecdotal evidence of this (e.g.

Since the Reform occurred last July, there have been many claims of the charts being 'frozen'. Oh yes, of course I will create a thread detailing my results.

Brave girls we ride